Please believe first acknowledging an extreme atomic negativity which could nuke all of us dead, ridding the Earth of all Humans and so their problems, but also imagine on extreme opposite being that of atomic positivity, where prosperity for all simply depends on leadership for their work efficiency, and in that better extreme might most of our foolish little problems be solved also though truly. There is a huge higher set of relativity, that can solve virtually all of our foolish worldly problems, a paradigm shift could come from real leadership. In a paradigm shift we'd again eat our vegetables instead of smoke them, we'd be creditted from and use what we're made of, such as Hydrogen for fuel instead of pollution. Ideally a paradigm shift is an ascension of sorts, like when humankind civillized or evolved, to the point where they stopped believing that the gods wanted them to sacrifice virgins. It isn't as wise to not publish a visionary who foresees a better future, using imagination as well as calculation that may ideal a greater reality, despite our seeming knowledge now of the society apparently. Maboloc, assistant professor of Philosophy at Ateneo de Davao University, holds master’s degrees in philosophy from Ateneo de Manila University and in applied ethics from Linkoping University in Sweden.Einstein once said, "imagination is more important than knowledge." He may be partly right, as I apologize, the above definition is for paradigm, perhaps allow me to better example a paradigm shift here. To do so is to plunge this country into a cynical acceptance of the despairing political realism of our times.Ĭhristopher Ryan B. Political solutions cannot and must not be forced beyond the bounds of legitimate authority. For this reason, civil society must not renege on its mandate to be that voice of dissent if the behaviors of those who are in positions of power no longer adhere to and transgresses the basic and moral requirements of the rule of law. The present national leadership has taken bold steps that neither history nor the current Constitution can serve as a relevant guide. But change is a painful process and, sometimes, a very dangerous proposition. The status quo is being challenged by the new order of things. The Filipino nation, indeed, is again in the midst of a political revolution. His style of governance, it can be said, is not just taxonomic in character. True enough, President Duterte is injecting political will in order to address many of our concerns-criminality in our streets, corruption and ineptitude in the bureaucracy, the Muslim rebellion in the south, and a Maoist insurgency. Obviously, the old ways of doing things must go if these cannot solve our problems. When transitioning to a new paradigm, it can be helpful for businesses to prioritize their customers' needs because. Adding new technology to a company allows them to serve their customers more quickly and possibly increase their customer outreach at the same time. In the case of Europe, the pursuit of individual freedom has rendered old feudal systems absolutely defunct. A paradigm shift is most often attributed to helping a business's customer base. Political revolutions are so often the death sentence to an era. Modern day monarchies are now merely symbolic or ceremonial in nature because the actual power to govern has been fully secularized. For instance, he mentions how monarchies and theocracies have been abandoned in Europe after the French Revolution. Kuhn’s influential work, which has since been translated into two dozen languages, uses political revolutions as the means of comparison in describing the actual nature of scientific revolutions. Bohr’s work served as the theoretical foundation in making the atom bomb, the development of nuclear medicine, and the birth of nanotechnology. It was known as the Planck-Einstein relation (E=hv). For example, Niels Bohr’s work on the internal structure of the atom is firmly grounded in the accuracy of Planck’s constant, discovered in 1900, which explained the basic relation between energy and frequency. Past scientific works are a source of background information. Kuhn also tells us that scientists capitalize on the textbook knowledge in their field. The heliocentric model provided a much simpler explanation in describing the orbit of heavenly bodies, thus, a paradigm shift. For example, Ptolemy’s geocentric model proved to be successful until the arrival of the Copernican model. An alternate theory will then emerge in order to replace the old one. Kuhn argues that shifts in scientific paradigms happen when an existing one is no longer adequate. Normal science for Kuhn is like puzzle-solving under the umbrella of a present theoretical model. According to Kuhn, scientists work on problems on the basis of existing norms. Hilary Putnam describes a paradigm as the successful application of a theory.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |